Religious Views On Abortion Religion Essay

ghostlike Views On Abortion Religion EssayAbortion is defined in different ways by different hatful the medical mental lexicon defines spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous stillbirth as a premature exit of the professional personduct of fantasyion from the uterus. It is the qualifying of pregnancy (MedicineNet.com, 1998).Religion is a key factor in the guarantee of morality in the ordering today in examining the concept of stillbirth and the perspective of the religion on abortion sensation must think how the different religions in the society influence this concept. Within the various sacred circles, it is urged and continuously deb taked whether a fetus is a aliment being. The main course is on when or at what stage does the state and religion portion stunned(p) a fetus to be a living being. Some religions argue against the state with the blockage that a fetus is non a living person. The telephone lines on the morality of abortion ar often based on the ghostly flavours.On the grounds of religion, each religious belief has its views on the concept of abortion, In Christianity abortion is considered a bad omen, an evil work out and non-acceptable by divinity, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that abortion is wrong and whatsoever member of the church building found involved in the practice bear be excommunicated from the church. The Jehovah witness also do shargon the ordinary belief with the catholic that abortion is wrong, it is concluded that in approximately Christian denominations, abortion is highly prohibited and at no time legitimate in the churches. Like an new(prenominal)(prenominal) fellow Christian communities, the protestant churches does non completelyow abortion, in the Northern Ireland the catholics as well as protestants halt come together to oppose the concept of abortion, this does not imply that every(prenominal) the Christians denominations against the act and co ncept abortion (SPUC,2010). Some of the Christian denominations are pro abortion and believe that abortion can help save lives if guardedly carried out with the help of doctors and professionals in the field of medicine much(prenominal) as in the Baptists and Methodists churches. In these cases, a woman was not disgraced subsequently having an abortion unless she went against the advice of a professional.The consistency of the Catholic Church against the abortion has embossed questions as yet this question was answered by catholic theorist James McCarthy. His demarcation was based on whether the life-time of a child begin ate the point of conception or not. It is however clear that there has been no clear church teaching on this matter, there has been lots of personal credit line at what point does a fetus become a kind-hearted being. Others argue that a person is more than than just now the biological parts, and believes that a living person has more advance characteris tics that a fetus do not posses, like the ability to think and make sexual congressships with other people (McCarthy,1996).The pro -life proponents also argue that the ability of a fetus to pull round independently defines it as a person, there argument is based on the right to life and they believe that the fetus can live given(p) time and good environment just like each other human beings. It is however realistic that the Catholics will still view abortion evil no matter what argument are brought forward (Dombrowski, 2000). From this argument we can easily conclude that the Catholics has viewed and will always view abortion as evil regardless of any positive contribution it has in the society it is also not clear whether they view fetus as a living human being.It therefore raises questions as to why the Catholics give out fetal baptisms, which were practiced early 1700s. The contradiction is clearly evident, the McCarthy claims that a fetus is not a human being and the early church carried out fatal baptism (McCarthy,1996).From this argument it is evident that intimately of the religious belief and concept on abortion is based on the human life, and the point at which it is considered to begin. Hindooism viewIn the Hindiism faith, abortion is considered evil however both(prenominal) of the Hindus texts prove abortion to be a necessary evil, since it save lives. The Hindu scripture reference the act of abortion as gorha-batta meaning uterus killing, the abortionist is referenced as the greatest sinner in the society as described by Atharva Veda. It is therefore clear that in the Hindus faith abortion is an abormination. The Vedas does not show when life begins or whether a fetus is a living being but it is clear that abortion is a repellent activity.This is as outlined in the part of the Aryan scriptures is in the Vedas which statesWhpe off, O Pushan Lord, the sins of him that practiseth abortion. (Sacred Books of the East).Another compelling evidenc e that abortion is unacceptable in the Hindu religion is contained in the books of Chandrasekhar (1974) in which he pointed out that induced abortion, which he referred to as bhrunahatya (foetus murder) is a sin. He pointed out that according to Vishnu Smriti (c. degree Celsius B.C. to 100 A.D.) ,the act of abortion which is the destruction an embryo can be considered as the killing of a holy person (Chandrasekhar,1974)Christian viewThe concept of abortion in the Jewish law is not as hard as the Christian way the Jewish legal authorities feed not established principles by which to determine the morality and validity of abortion in the society. The issue is complex and always refers back to the bible. The Bible on the other hand has a lot to say regarding the concept of abortion, the scriptural arguments indicated that the unborn child is a human being and constitutes Gods creation. God came up with three creations. The conceived life on the conception of God is a living, by and by conception the final result is referred to as the child in the likeness of God, as per the Bible the infant, child, son or daughter refer to the same thing since they are all creation of God. Other phrases of the Bible indicates that when men foment and one of them hit a woman who is expecting with the result of a spontaneous abortion, the amenable person will be charged based on the womans economize sagacity, but if other issues occur, the penalty will be life for life (Bible Exodus 2122). Life for life indicate the miscarriage is the loss of life, the life loss as a result of miscarriage is tantamount(predicate) to the life of the responsible person. It is therefore concluded that the stands of the Bible on the miscarriage or abortion is defined clearly, in loss of life through and through abortion is equivalent to the life lost for an existing human being.It is however not easy to simplify what the Bible state concerning abortion, several scholars has indicated that it i s not easy to determine the real knowledge on the matters relating to abortion. Most of the Christians however, are just told that abortion is prohibited and not allowed in the society. This concept just simplifies what is hard to comprehend in our society. It has become a matter of doing what God requires from his disciples, no matter what the consequences are to the living and the unborn the final shrewdness is however the Almighty God. (Ward,1978).In summary it is evident that the Bible controls most of the judgment in the Christian faith concerning abortion. This is however only neat if the finis is in congruence with Gods demands as outlined in the sanctified BibleBuddhism viewBuddhism on the other hand has a more relaxed approach to abortion. This is evident in the Buddhas way of life, as it tries to get extraneous from making finalization and judgment on matters. Buddha advised his followers not to accept or believe in any teaching from other religions not even Buddha hi mself. His emphasis was to investigate the teaching on how abortion is viewed from the people themselves and the society of the Buddhistic. If an individual within oneself finds a teaching to be true, then he should practice the teaching, but not trust any teaching by simply trusting them. Buddha first percepts state I will not harm any living creature this does not only apply to the human being community but to all animals, once a fetus is alive the Buddhism faith protest not to harm the fetus and protect the fetus.The Buddhist approach to ethical and kindly issues relating to abortion is based on the concept on mildness. The concept of mercy is important to the Buddhist than any other doctrines r laws set by the land. It is therefore important on any judgment as to whether abortion is good or evil in the land of the Buddhist one should bring in light the concept of mercy to the fetus forwards any argument is made. Most Buddhist feel that in relation to the concept of compass ion abortion is wrong, and regrettable, it is viewed as the act of depriving the unborn the tender right to live, however the compassion should be both to the fetus and the return, it whitethorn be to a level where the compassionate on the fetus whitethorn deprive the mother the right to life. In this case Buddha then indicates that you do what I feel is right, such circumstances are allowed so that each individual arrive at the right conclusion and not judgmental.In conclusion, reviews of literature from various Buddhist ethicists do bear a linguistic worldwide consensus that education is the best policy in tackling abortion. In this light, they advocate giving birth control as well as encouraging the drill of contraceptives (Tsomo,1998)DiscussionsThis query however makes me to misunderstand the result of engaging in abortion, it relays that if a woman from the Buddhist faith engages in the act of abortion, she should be comforted with compassion rather than judgment and puni shment.These religious have had their share of impact in different societies, and they have brought different views on the concept of abortion example, most of the United States population claims to be Catholic (Dombrowski, 2000) however there is no religion that stick to there rules and doctrines. It would be hard to say that religious factors are insignificant considering Roman Catholicism is the leading opponent of abortion (Abernethy, 1994). Hindus had been very firm and so many people. The Catholics have always been exigent and against the act, but it is evident that most of the faithful indulge in such activities and the church assume not to know as a result of not losing the faithful. The religion has therefore left us in the immorality whether abortion is good or not allowed within the church. It therefore calls for a personal judgment and that why this question, Is abortion Right? Is an open terminate question that can be answered based on the individual judgment and not religious grounds and the doctrines of the church.ConclusionsOn my opinion the concept of compassion brought in the Buddhist faith, is more appealing, however abortion should be carried out with the assistant of a health professional, and only when it is dangerous to either the mother or the child. The mother side should be given precedence since she is a living being in existence as to the un-born as believed by the Buddhist. It is therefore depended on individual judgment whether to carry out abortion or not. The Buddhist vie of abortion is more liberal this is because it leaves the decision to the person who engages in the act to a large extent. The contemporary society is fuelled largely by the emancipation of personal choice and technology. These doctrines seem to be well illustrated in the Buddhist view of abortion. To support my choice for Buddhist way of handling the abortion issue, I present the general universal consensus that the various Buddhist ethicists have advanced . In fact their approach to abortion has been considered by other scholars and organizations as being the best as pointed out by SPUC (2010). Tsomo (1998) further points out that Buddhists do recognize the level of incongruity that exists in the ethical theory of abortion as well as in the actual practice of the abortion. They however do not in any way condone the inappropriate, meaningless and taking of life. They therefore use their views of morality of abortion to advocate for a universal understanding as well as the expression of compassion towards all forms of living things. Their views are nonjudgmental while respecting both the rights as well as the freedom of all human beings in the making of their own choices.