To what extent should we make moral judgments about cultural practices Essay

To what extent should we bring in chaste concepts more or less ethnical practices from outside our own culture - Essay ExampleThose who recommend this pick out that the world is sharply divided into separate societies, sealed units, each with its own system of thought. They feel that the obedience and tolerance due from one system to a nonher forbids us ever to take up a critical position to any different culture. (Midgley, 69) According to this perspective, moralistic judgment is a kind of neologism valid only in its country of origin and the author terms this position ass moral isolationism. Midgley withal maintains that it is not forced upon individuals, and indeed makes no sense at all, to make moral judgment to the highest degree other cultures. Unlike the general thinking that such an attempt to make moral judgment about other cultures is a respectful attitude to other cultures, the author purports that one ejectnot respect what is entirely hidden to one and in th at respectfore it is not respectful attitude. Here, the author comes up with her central argument of the article and there is every reason to realize it as true and rational. As the author argues, it is essential for one to retire enough about another person or culture in order to come up with an evenhanded judgment about the culture or person. Therefore, Mary Midgley makes some essential arguments concerning moral judgment of other cultures in her article On Trying out Ones New Sword and a ruminative analysis of the article helps us in determining to what extent we should make moral judgments about cultural practices from outside our own culture. The article On Trying out Ones New Sword suggests a moral isolationism which lays down a general ban on moral reasoning with regard to making moral judgments about strange cultures. In order to establish her argument, the author makes use of some remote mannequin from the classical Japanese with a verb which means to try out ones new sw ord on a chance journeyer. According to this example, the Samurai is required to try out this new sword on any wayfarer who was not another Samurai, and this action could injure his honor, offend his ancestors, and even let down his emperor. Now when we essay of a custom like this, we may well reflect that we do not understand it and accordingly are not qualified to criticize it at all, because we are not members of that culture. But we are not members of any other culture either, except our own. So we extend the principle to cover all external cultures, and we seem therefore to be moral isolationists. (Midgley, 70) Midgley also deals with certain fundamental questions about moral isolationism with savoir-faire to making moral judgments about strange cultures. First of all, she examines whether the isolating barrier work both slipway or people in other cultures are equally unable to criticize others. According to her, outsiders can deliver perfectly good indictments, although i t makes more than two weeks to make them demining. Intelligent outsiders can progress in it, and in some ways will be at an advantage over the locals. But, if this is so, it must all the way apply to ourselves as much as anybody else. (Midgley, 70) The author also deals with the question whether the isolating barrier amidst cultures block praise as well as blame. It is important to make immaculate judgments about other